BREAKING: Ohio Open Carrier Sues City for $3.6 Million After Being Illegally Detained, Disarmed, and Charged

May 16 2013
by GSL Staff
Share This Post
      

Guns Save Lives is not supported by ads and is ran as an independent project. If you support this project please consider supporting us on Patreon. Registration takes just a moment and even $1 is a massive help in continuing our work. Thank you so much.

According to a report in mydaytondailynews.com, the city of Dayton, OH is going to have to defend itself against a $3.6 million lawsuit for alleged misconduct by its officers.

Roy Call, an Ohio resident, was openly carrying his XDM .40 handgun in a holster on his belt when he went to a local convenience store around 4:30am on Aug. 12, 2012.

During his visit to the store, Mr. Call was approached by officers, who said they were responding to a call about a man with an openly displayed gun.

Call refused to identify himself or provide any identification (not a crime). Once officers discovered his ID and CCW permit in his truck nearby (possibly during an illegal search), he was set free, but was still charged with obstruction of justice, a charge which was dropped a couple of months later.

A little background:
– Openly carrying a firearm is legal in many states, including Ohio, and in fact, does not require a license at all in many of those states.
– Courts, including the Supreme Court of the Unites States, have repeatedly ruled that the mere presence of a firearm is not sufficient reason to detain someone.
– Mr. Call asked an officer if he was free to go at one point, to which he was told “No”. This legally constitutes a detention by law enforcement.

According to MyDayotnDailyNews.com,

The suit asks for $600,000 for compensatory damages for “emotional trauma” and other factors and for $3 million in punitive damages for the “willful, callous and malicious conduct” of the defendants. Call’s attorney, Charles E. McFarland of New Castle, Ky., said: “I normally do not comment on ongoing cases to the media, but believe that the complaint speaks for itself.”

Chief [of Police Mark] Reiss added: “With carrying a firearm openly, there also comes responsibility with that. People should realize that they may, given a certain set of circumstances, draw the attention of law enforcement. A responsible person would just identify themselves if there’s a brief check to be done and then they would be on their way.”

Disqus Comments

comments powered by Disqus