Quantcast
Subscribe to me on YouTube

[Video] Armed Burglar Sues 90 Year Old Homeowner For Shooting Him During Attack

November 1 2012
from → Self Defense

submit to reddit        Pin It
Incident at a Glance (Click Links For Similar Stories)
Gun(s) Used: Location:
# of Suspects: Shots Fired:
Suspect Killed: State:

Stock - gun in hand

According to CBS San Francisco, a 90 year old homeowner is lucky to be alive after an altercation with an armed home invader. The intruder shot the homeowner and then tried to execute the homeowner, even after being shot 3 times.

Now the would be murderer is suing the homeowner for “negligently” shooting him.

Video interview below and more info at the link.



Read the full article here:
http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2012/10/24/burglar-who-shot...

Is the link above broken? You can view an archived copy of the source article here: http://www.webcitation.org/6Bqsk3maG

10 Responses leave one →
  1. Justinc permalink
    November 1, 2012 11:14 AM EDT

    Two words: F*** California.

  2. Don Maxwell permalink
    November 1, 2012 12:35 PM EDT

    Knowing California the courts will find the homeowner guilty!!!! I pray the homeowner will not be charged in any way though.

  3. CC Ryder permalink
    November 1, 2012 2:57 PM EDT

    Yep,
    Another case of the thugs going after older folks. Then this thug puke is going bring a law suit because he broke into the guy’s house shoots the homeower who then returns fire?

  4. cliff permalink
    November 1, 2012 3:48 PM EDT

    California, figures. Sounds like more $ for the defense layers. The 90 year old probably won’t live through the trial.Can’t even stand your ground at home with out a trial.

  5. snuggles permalink
    November 3, 2012 6:25 PM EDT

    If the thug is an Illegal Alien he will win, get damages and political asylum.

  6. BambiB permalink
    November 4, 2012 1:04 AM EDT

    Florida’s more civilized. Not only does FS §776.032 provide:

    The court shall award reasonable attorney’s fees, court costs, compensation for loss of income, and all expenses incurred by the defendant in defense of any civil action brought by a plaintiff if the court finds that the defendant is immune from prosecution as provided in subsection (1)

    but under FS § 776.085:
    The losing party, if convicted of and incarcerated for the crime or attempted crime, shall, as determined by the court, lose any privileges provided by the correctional facility, including, but not limited to:
    1. Canteen purchases;
    2. Telephone access;
    3. Outdoor exercise;
    4. Use of the library; and
    5. Visitation. 

    Don’t know how hard the judges drop this hammer, but imagine being a crook who is cut off from canteen, telephone, exercise, library and visitation for suing someone who lawfully shot you.

  7. Fred P. permalink
    November 4, 2012 8:36 PM EDT

    Unfortunately, the idiot thug survived.

    Let that be a lesson – shoot to STOP the threat.

    • Brandon permalink
      November 6, 2012 1:31 PM EDT

      “Let that be a lesson – shoot to STOP the threat.”

      Exactly. The threat can go on, even if the thug is shot and arrested. Don’t let that happen.

  8. warren permalink
    November 8, 2012 10:22 PM EDT

    “STOP THE THREAT!” …”STOP THERE BREATHEN & YOU’VE STOPPED THE THREAT” it’s a shame it has 2 be that way,but some people don’t want 2 work for a live’n, they want 2 take ur
    while ur out work’n 2 pay
    4 it. My heart go’s out 2 the 90 year old.

Leave a Reply

Did you know we also have a discussion forum? Click Here to join the discussion!




Close
Connect with us!
Easily support this site by Liking or Following us on social Media!

On Facebook



On Twitter


On Youtube

Subscribe to me on YouTube