Inside the Mind of a Liberal Anti Gunner – Step by Step, Long Term Plan to Ban ALL Guns
If there are still any gun owners out there that are thinking about compromising your rights in order to appease the anti gunners then you might want to read this piece written by a liberal gun grabber.
It describes a long term (think years or decades) plan for banning all guns.
It starts with eliminating private sales. Without private sales almost all guns can be pretty well traced from the manufacturer to the owner. Banning private sales (notice I’m saying private, if you bring a dealer or government entity into this it is no longer a private sale) is the same thing as the “universal background checks” we keep hearing about, that according to the mainstream media has a lot of support (although according to an internal poll at the NRA, only 5% of members are in favor of them).
Once they stop guns from legally changing hands in private transactions that’s where registration comes into play.
Once you know where all of the guns are, just wait for the next mass shooting or other disaster that happens when the legislative makeup of Congress is favorable to gun control and pass some legislation to start confiscating weapons.
Here are some of the key quotes from the article.
The very first thing we need is national registry. We need to know where the guns are, and who has them. Canada has a national firearms registry. We need to copy their model. We need a law demanding all firearms be registered to a national database. We need to know who has them and where they are. We need to make this as easy as possible for gun owners. The federal government provides the money and technical expertise, and the State police carry it out. … I think about 6 months should be enough time.
…So registration is the first step. Now that the vast majority are registered, we can do what we will. One good first step would be to close the registry to new registrations. This would, in effect, prevent new guns from being made or imported. This would put the murder machine corporations out of business for good, and cut the money supply to the NRA/GOA. As money dries up, the political capital needed for new controls will be greatly reduced.
…We must make guns expensive and unpopular, just like cigarettes. A nationwide, antigun campaign paid for by a per gun yearly tax paid by owners, dealers, and manufacturers would work well in this regard. We should also segway into an anti-hunting campaign, like those in the UK. By making hunting expensive and unpopular, we can make the transition to a gun free society much less of a headache for us.
…this is the only way we can be truly safe. I don’t want my kids being shot at by a deranged NRA member. I’m sure you don’t either. So lets stop looking for short term solutions and start looking long term…
Source:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/12/21/1172661/-How-to-Ban...
These people have absolutely no clue how the legislative process works, or the will of American gun owners. We will never give up our firearms.
wow speechless you are literally retarded! You have a great plan by the way… NOT! Oh and you forgot to mention how well criminals follow laws! I hope a law abiding citizen saves your ass with his carry weapon so that you can shut the fuck up!
Small flaw in this plan, The Canadian Govt has actually scrapped part of the National Gun registry for the simple reason that it didnt work.
Let’s start this process with the criminals. Make them register their weapons, tax them for one year, and then after a year let’s reassess where we are.
By the way, that was sarcasm.
You do realize, don’t you, that the Supreme Court has ruled (U.S. v. Haynes (1968)) that criminals cannot be required to register their guns? This was held to violate their right against self-incrimination, since they aren’t allowed to have guns.
according to the writers scenario; the SECOND thing that will happen is that our enemies will have no fear of invading us…
not to mention the govt. won’t have any fear to create any laws and rules it so chooses. Most dictators understand that.
I wonder what will happen to guns that are willed to heirs or simply handed on from one generation to another. Who is going to know where the owners are of previously registered guns! Leave it to our government to try to make a law that is broken before it starts. Kind of reminds me of what is happening with the Affordable Care Act. Wonder if they can manage to make 13,000 pages out of this also!
The point of the law would be to control ALL transfers of firearms. That would include the examples you cite. It would be a crime to transfer ownership of a firearm to anyone without going the the Universal Background Check.
“shot by some deranged NRA member?”
See, here’s the funny part about liberals:
They NEVER state who causes AND who is victimized by the majority of gun crime in America:
Urban blacks.
How is ANY legislation planned or already passed going to change this fact?
Oddly enough, all of the mass shooters since 1994 have been from democratic backgrounds or outright registered (D)
Research for yourself, please… it gives more credibility.
“I don’t want my kids being gunned down by some deranged NRA member”??? Are you freakin serious you retard? How many of these mass shootings have been committed by members of the NRA exactly?
The funny part about this whole idiotic thing is that the dangerous nutcases who take guns and cause mass murders are majority liberals or kids brought up in liberal surroundings. Mother Jones magazine did a study on the last 62 mass murders, and published it… and amid headlines and ‘critical commentary’ that makes it sound like their findings were that guns kill people and NRA members kill people, their data proves that it is neither.
The whole gun control thing is corrupted from step one by data that disproves every single conclusion.
Sporks, who wrote the piece that this article refers to, embodies everything the liberals claim as litmus for a ‘hater’: he derides his opponents as ignorant because they disagree with him, he labels Supreme Court justices as “fascists” because their rulings on private gun ownership disagree with what he wants, he talks freely about one of them dying and Obama appointing a liberal judge so we get a correct ruling (ie, the one he wants) and he lies constantly, not least that the idea of individual ownership of guns being a right is only 30 years old in American Jurisprudence. And yes, of course, no liberal will recognize or assign to him the term ‘hater’ because he isn’t a conservative.
Frankly, sporks is a nutcase, and you aren’t doing the country any good by
a) republishing his half-baked thoughts
b) spreading fear that nuts like him are going to be able to overthrow the Constitution or get Obama (who has proven that he’s far too careful to use Executive Order power to do anything so clearly anti-constitutional) to
c) acting like there is a shred of value to his warped views.
“I don’t want my kids being shot at by a deranged NRA member”
To me the most cogent line in the piece. Liberals are simply superior to the knuckle draggers in the rest of America. They have no problem whatsoever in demonizing their fellow citizens for one simple reason: they do not see us as “fellow citizens” but rather as some sort of semi-sentient life form that unfortunately shares the continent with them.
And idiot, Canada is killing the registry, it never worked and cost a fortune for no useful purpose.
If there are any semi-sentient beings here its liberals.
Please don’t paint (or tar and feather) all leftists with the same brush. I’m probably a tad left of liberal, politically and socially, AND I’m a gun owner AND I support all of the Bill of Rights, including the second. Vehemently.
The person who wrote the article on Daily Kos is obviously ignorant of the facts. He believes what he sees on TV. He has not educated himself. My experience is that that’s a problem on the Left and the Right in this country, on a whole range of issues.
We should, perhaps, be a little more patient with each other and a little more inclined to intelligent debate instead of name-calling.
Holy crap, the guy who wrote that is a total nutcase. You should see him trying to defend his insanity in the comments.